| General Chess Discussion - Ratings #3 No, you have played less games, so your rating is more volatile and will tend to change in larger numbers than others | qkxwsm  |
| Lichess Feedback - Is it possible to get en.lichess.com unconditionally?#2 LOL, you troll the e in your url is not an english e, it is actually https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ye_(Cyrillic) EDIT @game_spectator: yeah, you're right | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#10 https://lichess.org/sXZeupE8#130 another one | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#8 Interestingly, the stockfish in local analysis mode also sometimes but not always gives the same incorrect evaluation as the lichess stockfish | qkxwsm |
| Game analysis - K+3P endgame tricks.#6 Lol I tried it once and got 6/10 in a round where there was one bad puzzle. | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#4 https://lichess.org/NS4uTWtG#104 53. Ke4 is not a blunder | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#3 https://lichess.org/FAH81TCh#164 83 Ke4 loses | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#2 https://lichess.org/Sid3ho11#101 51. Kg2 loses | qkxwsm |
| Game analysis - K+3P endgame tricks.#4 a bunch of the endgames have a wrong computer evaluation: https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/engine-in-pawn-endgames i'll post if i find more | qkxwsm |
| Lichess Feedback - engine in pawn endgames#1 i've found some interesting errors of the engine's evaluation in pawn endgames: https://lichess.org/u7Way2Lv#92 46...g4 is not a blunder, it wins perfectly fine https://lichess.org/3gU01KnP#158 I beli… | qkxwsm |
| Next |
|---|